Breach of Contract in Thailand

Contracts serve as the cornerstone of business transactions, outlining the rights and obligations of parties involved. However, when one party fails to fulfill its contractual duties, it constitutes a breach of contract. In Thailand, as in many jurisdictions, breach of contract cases are governed by legal principles outlined in the Civil and Commercial Code. This article provides a comprehensive guide to breach of contract in Thailand, covering key legal principles, types of breaches, available remedies, and the dispute resolution process.

Legal Principles:

  1. Civil and Commercial Code:

    The Civil and Commercial Code of Thailand governs contractual relationships and provides the legal framework for addressing breach of contract issues. Specific provisions, particularly in Sections 366-399, outline the rights and remedies available to parties in the event of a breach.

  2. Good Faith:

    Thai contract law is underpinned by the principle of good faith. Parties are expected to act honestly and fairly in their contractual dealings, and the law prohibits actions that would be deemed contrary to good morals.

Types of Breach:

  1. Material Breach:

    A material breach is a significant violation of the contract that goes to the heart of the agreement. It is a breach that is serious enough to justify the non-breaching party’s termination of the contract and pursuit of remedies.

  2. Minor Breach:

    A minor or partial breach, often referred to as a “breach of warranty,” is a less severe violation that does not go to the core of the contract. In such cases, the non-breaching party is entitled to seek compensation for damages but typically cannot terminate the contract.

Available Remedies:

  1. Compensatory Damages:

    Compensatory damages are the most common remedy for breach of contract. The non-breaching party is entitled to receive compensation for the losses suffered as a direct result of the breach. This may include actual financial losses, lost profits, or consequential damages.

  2. Specific Performance:

    In cases where monetary damages may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party, the court may order specific performance. This remedy compels the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations as outlined in the agreement.

  3. Cancellation or Rescission:

    The non-breaching party may seek to cancel or rescind the contract, effectively putting the parties back in the position they were in before entering the agreement. This remedy is typically pursued in cases of material breach.

  4. Liquidated Damages:

    Some contracts include provisions for liquidated damages, predetermined amounts agreed upon by the parties at the time of contract formation. These amounts serve as compensation in the event of a specific type of breach.

Dispute Resolution Process:

  1. Negotiation:

    Before initiating formal legal proceedings, the parties involved in a breach of contract dispute may engage in negotiation. This allows for open communication to explore potential resolutions and reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

  2. Mediation:

    Mediation is a non-adversarial form of dispute resolution where a neutral third party facilitates discussions between the parties. The goal is to arrive at a voluntary settlement. While the mediator does not impose a decision, successful mediation can lead to a binding settlement agreement.

  3. Arbitration:

    Many contracts include arbitration clauses, where disputes are resolved through arbitration rather than litigation. Arbitration is a more private and expedited process, and the arbitrator’s decision is binding.

  4. Litigation:

    When negotiation, mediation, or arbitration fails to resolve the dispute, parties may resort to litigation. Civil lawsuits for breach of contract are typically filed in the appropriate court, and the legal process involves presenting evidence, arguments, and seeking a judgment from the court.

Statute of Limitations:

  1. Time Constraints:

    Parties should be mindful of the statute of limitations, which sets a time limit for initiating legal proceedings. In Thailand, the general statute of limitations for breach of contract cases is typically ten years, but this can vary depending on the nature of the contract.

Practical Considerations:

  1. Written Contracts:

    While verbal contracts are generally valid in Thailand, having a written contract provides clarity and serves as valuable evidence in case of a dispute. It is advisable to have contracts in writing, especially for significant transactions.

  2. Good Record-Keeping:

    Maintaining thorough records of all communications, documents, and transactions related to the contract is essential. This documentation can be crucial in proving the existence of the contract and the extent of the breach.

  3. Legal Advice:

    Seeking legal advice is advisable, especially when navigating complex contractual disputes. An experienced attorney can provide guidance on the legal merits of the case, the available remedies, and the most effective course of action.


Breach of contract issues can pose significant challenges to businesses and individuals alike. Understanding the legal principles, types of breaches, available remedies, and the dispute resolution process is crucial for parties involved in contractual relationships in Thailand. While legal action is a last resort, having a clear understanding of the rights and obligations outlined in the Civil and Commercial Code empowers parties to make informed decisions and seek appropriate remedies when faced with a breach of contract.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *